ABSTRACT
Objectives: The 90-day double-blind phase (DBP) of the Phase 3 EASE study demonstrated accelerated wound healing for Oleogel-S10 (birch triterpenes) versus control gel in epidermolysis bullosa (EB). Here, we report safety and total wound burden results from the 24-month open-label phase (OLP) in which all patients received treatment with Oleogel-S10. Method(s): Total wound burden was assessed using EB Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI) and Body Surface Area Percentage (BSAP). Data are reported without visit windows to reflect a realworld situation more accurately, particularly considering the COVID- 19 pandemic. Result(s): The patient population was made up of dystrophic EB (n = 178, 86.8%) and junctional EB (n = 25, 12.2%);71.7% (n = 147) of patients were aged <18 years. 141 patients (68.8%) completed the OLP. The mean (SD) treatment duration for all patients was 584.7 (246.1) days. Adverse events were reported in 77.1% of all patients in the OLP versus 81.7% of those receiving Oleogel-S10 in the DBP. Mean BSAP for patients treated with Oleogel-S10 in the DBP reduced from 12.1% at study entry to 6.1% with 27 months of treatment. Similarly, the mean EBDASI skin activity score in the Oleogel-S10 group improved from 19.6 to 15.1 after 27 months. In addition, reductions in both BSAP and EBDASI from OLP baseline were observed in patients who transitioned from control gel to Oleogel-S10 in the OLP. Discussion(s): These data support a reassuring long-term safety profile of Oleogel-S10. Furthermore, the reduction in wound burden previously reported with 15 months of Oleogel-S10 treatment is maintained to the end of OLP. This is encouraging given the nature of this chronic genetic disorder in which there is regular cycling of patients' fragile wounds.
ABSTRACT
The phase 3 MOMENTUM study (NCT04173494) of the ACVR1/JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor momelotinib (MMB) vs. danazol (DAN) in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) previously treated with a JAK inhibitor (JAKi) met the primary endpoint and all key secondary endpoints at week 24 (W24). We provide updated results from week 48 assessments. Eligible patients had primary or post-ET/ PV MF;DIPSS high, Int-2, or Int-1 risk;Total Symptom Score (TSS) >=10;haemoglobin (Hb) <10 g/dL;platelets >=25 x 109/L;prior JAKi for >=90 days (>=28 days if red blood cell [RBC] transfusions >=4 units in 8 weeks or grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia/anaemia/ hematoma);and palpable spleen >=5 cm. Randomisation was 2:1 to MMB 200 mg/day or DAN 600 mg/day for 24 weeks, followed by open-label (OL) MMB. Week 48 endpoints included durations of response (TSS, transfusion independence [TI], splenic) and overall and leukaemia-free survival (OS, LFS). As of 17 May 2022, 93/130 (72%) MMB -> MMB and 41/65 (63%) DAN -> MMB patients received OL MMB;mean MMB durations were 48 weeks and 24 weeks, respectively. Analyses for W24 responders showed the following: of TSS responders, 31/32 (97%) MMB -> MMB and 6/6 DAN -> MMB patients had TSS < baseline;of TI responders, 36/40 (90%) and 10/13 (77%) had no RBC transfusions or Hb <8 g/dL;and of spleen responders, all patients had splenic volume < baseline. In the OL phase, the most common grade >=3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were thrombocytopenia (MMB -> MMB, 9%;DAN -> MMB, 15%) and anaemia (MMB -> MMB, 9%;DAN -> MMB, 2%). Grade >=3 infections occurred in 19% of MMB -> MMB and 10% of DAN -> MMB patients, including grade >=3 (nonfatal) COVID-19. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) occurred in 2% of patients in each arm, and none discontinued MMB due to PN. TEAEs led to MMB discontinuation in 18% (MMB -> MMB) vs. 10% (DAN -> MMB). A trend towards improved OS up to W24 was previously observed with MMB vs. DAN (hazard ratio [HR], 0.506;p = 0.0719);after all patients crossed over to OL MMB, OS and LFS curves for both arms converged (HR, 0.945, 95% CI, 0.528-1.693;HR, 0.830, 95% CI, 0.473-1.4555). Sixty of 81 (74%) MMB -> MMB and 29 of 43 (67%) DAN -> MMB patients with baseline platelets <=150 x 109/L entered the OL phase. Efficacy and safety results in thrombocytopenic subgroups in the OL period were consistent with the intent-to- treat (ITT) population. OL MMB maintained symptom, TI, and spleen responses with continued good survival and safety in the ITT and low platelet populations. MMB may address an unmet need in anaemic patients with MF.
ABSTRACT
Lung cancer is the most common cancer in males and the second most common among females both in Europe and worldwide. Moreover, lung cancer is the leading cause of death due to cancer in males. The European region accounts for 23% of total cancer cases and 20% of cancer-related deaths. Relationships have been described between a number of infectious agents and cancers, but our knowledge of the role of viruses, both respiratory and systemic, in the pathogenesis of lung cancer is still rudimentary and has been poorly disseminated. In this chapter, we review the available evidence on the involvement of HPV, Epstein-Barr virus, HIV, cytomegalovirus and measles virus in the epidemiology and pathogenesis of lung cancer.Copyright © ERS 2021.
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients (pts) with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and prior inadequate response or intolerance to >=1 biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) at week (wk) 56 in the phase 3 SELECT-PsA 2 study. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of UPA at wk 104 from the ongoing long-term extension of SELECTPsA 2. Methods Pts were randomized to UPA 15mg (UPA15), UPA 30mg (UPA30), or placebo (PBO) for 24 wks;PBO pts were then switched to UPA15 or UPA30. For continuous UPA treatment groups, efficacy endpoints at wk 104 were analyzed using non-responder imputation (NRI) and as observed (AO) (binary endpoints) or mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) and AO (continuous endpoints). Treatmentemergent adverse events (TEAEs) were summarized for pts who received >=1 dose of study drug using visit-based cut-off at wk 104. Results A total of 641 pts received >=1 dose of study drug. At wk 104, 38.4% of all patients had discontinued study drug, with the highest discontinuation observed in patients randomized to PBO at baseline (all PBO: 46.7%). The most common reasons for discontinuation were lack of efficacy (UPA15: 12.3%, UPA30: 8.7%, all PBO: 21.7%) and adverse event (UPA15: 10.9%, UPA30: 13.3%, all PBO: 12.7%). The proportion of UPA pts that achieved ACR20/50/70, MDA, PASI75/90/100, and resolution of dactylitis and enthesitis were generally similar, or further improved, with 104 wks of treatment vs 56 wks. Similarly, mean change from baseline in HAQ-DI, patient's assessment of pain, BASDAI, and ASDAS was improved with UPA treatment. At 104 wks of therapy, clinical responses were largely similar with UPA15 and UPA30. Generally, safety data at wk 104 were consistent with that reported at wk 56. Rates of serious infection, herpes zoster, hepatic disorder, anemia, neutropenia, lymphopenia, and CPK elevation remained numerically higher with UPA30 vs UPA15, while rates of malignancies, MACE, and VTE were similar for both UPA groups. One death was reported with UPA15 (unexplained due to lack of information;however, the patient had recently been diagnosed with ovarian cancer) and two with UPA30 (pancytopenia and COVID-19 pneumonia). Conclusion In PsA pts with prior inadequate response or intolerance to>=1 bDMARD, clinical responses were maintained with UPA15 and UPA30 up to two years of treatment. No new safety signals were identified in this long-term extension.
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims Advances in rational drug design and recent clinical trials are leading to emergence of a range of novel therapies for SLE and therapeutic options in clinical practice are expected to broaden rapidly. The optimal real-world place of emerging and established agents will be guided by understanding their differential efficacy on specific SLE manifestations as well as efficacy for more resistant disease. Anifrolumab, a type-I interferon receptor blocking monoclonal antibody, showed efficacy in SLE in phase III trials with a notable effect on mucocutaneous disease although specific lesion subtypes and chroncicity were not explored. Severe refractory mucocutaneous SLE such as scarring discoid lesions are an important and common clinical challenge in current practice. We therefore prospectively evaluated the real-world efficacy and quality of life impact of anifolumab for active mucocutaneous SLE, recalcitrant to multiple biologic and immunosuppressant therapies. Methods Seven patients commenced anifrolumab (300mg by monthly iv infusion) following application to the manufacturer's early access programme (NCT 04750057). Prior biologic therapies were discontinued at least 5 half-lives in advance. Mucocutaneous disease activity was captured by Cutaneous Lupus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) activity score and medical photography. Patient reported health-related quality of life comprising the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI);Lupus-QoL and EQ5D-5L were evaluated at baseline, three and six months. Results Seven female patients with active mucocutaneous SLE (Discoid LE n=5, chilblain LE n=1, subacute cutaneous LE n=1) and median disease duration of 17 years were evaluated. Median baseline CLASI activity score was 17 (range 10-26;higher scores indicating severe disease). Median number of previously failed therapies was 7 and included rituximab in 6/7, belimumab in 2/7 and thalidomide in 4/7. Rapid resolution of scale and erythema in DLE was established within 1 month of anifrolumab treatment. Improvements to chilblain lupus were evident by three months. CLASI activity score was improved >=75% in all patients at 3 months. Clinical responses were associated with significant improvements in DLQI (p<0.001) and EQ5D-VAS (p=0.002) by three months. Lupus-QoL trended toward improvement across all domains but most strongly for fatigue (p=0.01) and pain (p=0.002) by 6 months. One patient discontinued treatment after 4 months due to polydermatomal shingles complicated by sensorineural hearing loss. Infection coincided with background prednisolone dose >15mg daily, recent COVID-19 infection and new on-treatment hypogammaglobulinaemia (IgG <5g/L). Prolonged aciclovir treatment was required for lesion resolution. Conclusion We report rapid real-world efficacy and quality of life impact of anifrolumab on highly refractory mucocutaneous SLE, which exceeded that anticipated from existing clinical trial data. Findings suggest a unique role for emerging interferon targeting therapies in management of mucocutaneous SLE but emphasize need for enhanced VZV precautions among higher risk patients.
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims: The clinical course of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in individuals with HIV-1 coinfection is marked by accelerated disease progression. A tenofovir-containing antiretroviral regimen is recommended in most people with HIV-1/HBV-coinfection, but there have not been randomized studies of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) vs tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) in treatment- naive HIV-1/HBV-coinfected individuals. We report primary endpoint results from a Phase 3 study comparing bictegravir/emtricitabine/ TAF (B/F/TAF) vs dolutegravir + emtricitabine/TDF (DTG + F/TDF) at Week (W)48 in participants initiating treatment for both viruses. Method(s): Adults with HIV-1/HBV coinfection were randomized 1:1 to initiate blinded treatment with B/F/TAF or DTG + F/TDF (with placebo). Primary endpoints were the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA<50 copies/mL (FDA Snapshot) and plasma HBV DNA<29 IU/mL (missing = failure) at W48. Noninferiority was assessed with 95% CI (12% margin). Secondary and other endpoints included change from baseline cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) count, proportion with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss/seroconversion, and alanine transaminase (ALT) normalization (AASLD criteria). Result(s): Participants (N = 243) were randomized and treated (B/F/ TAF [n = 121], DTG + F/TDF [n = 122]) from 11 countries in Asia, Europe, North, and Latin America. Baseline characteristics were median age of 32 years, 4.5% female, 88% Asian, 30% HIV-1 RNA>100,000 c/mL, 40% CD4<200 cells/lL, median HBV DNA 8.1 log10 IU/mL, 78% HBeAg+. At W48, B/F/TAF was noninferior to DTG + F/TDF at achieving HIV-1 RNA<50 copies/mL (95% vs 91%, difference 4.1%;95% CI -2.5%-10.8%;P = 0.21), with mean CD4 gains of + 200 and + 175 cells/lL, respectively. B/F/TAF was superior to DTG + F/TDF at achieving HBV DNA<29 IU/mL (63% vs 43%, difference 16.6%;95% CI 5.9%-27.3%;P = 0.0023). Participants treated with B/F/TAF vs DTG + F/TDF had numerically higher HBsAg loss (13% vs 6%;P = 0.059), HBeAg loss (26% vs 14%;P = 0.055), HBeAg seroconversion (23% vs 11%;P = 0.031), and ALT normalization (73% vs 55%;P = 0.066). The most frequent adverse events among participants treated with B/F/TAF vs DTG + F/TDF were upper respiratory tract infection (17% vs 11%), COVID- 19 (13% vs 11%), pyrexia (9% vs 12%), ALT increase (7% vs 11%), and nasopharyngitis (11% vs 4%). ALT flares (elevations at >= 2 consecutive postbaseline visits) occurred in 11 participants (7 B/F/ TAF, 4 DTG + F/TDF), and all resolved. Conclusion(s): Among adults with HIV-1/HBV-coinfection starting antiviral therapy, both B/F/TAF and DTG + F/TDF had high HIV-1 suppression at year 1, with B/F/TAF resulting in superior HBV DNA suppression and significantly more HBeAg seroconversion. Safety findings were similar between groups.
ABSTRACT
Intro: VLA2001 is a highly-purified, inactivated whole-virus SARS-CoV-2 vaccine based on a dual-adjuvant system of Alum and CpG1018 for induction of a robust immune response. The vaccine was designed using a well-established technology platform and has received full marketing authorization in Europe. In a pivotal Phase 3 trial, VLA2001 demonstrated superior neutralizing antibody geometric mean titers (GMT) to the comparator, AstraZeneca's AZD1222, as well as non-inferior seroconversion rates two weeks after priming. The extension of the Phase 3 trial evaluated safety and immunogenicity of homologous and heterologous booster vaccinations of VLA2001. Method(s): This is a randomized observer-blind controlled, pivotal trial conducted in the UK in participants aged >=18 years who were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive two doses of VLA2001 or AZD1222, 28 days apart. A booster with VLA2001 was administered to eligible participants at 7 to 8 months after priming. The primary safety outcome was the frequency and severity of any adverse event following the booster vaccination. The primary immunogenicity outcomes were the GMT and fold increase of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 two weeks after the booster vaccination. The study is registered under NCT04864561. Finding(s): A booster dose of VLA2001 is well-tolerated in both AZD1222 and VLA2001 primed participants. High neutralizing antibody titers and fold- increases were generated two weeks following a booster of VLA2001. Cross- neutralizing serological responses against Delta and the Omicron BA.4/BA.5 variants of concern are elicited following a homologous or heterologous booster dose in VLA2001 or AZD1222 primed participants, respectively. Additionally, VLA2001 induced broad T-cell responses with antigen-specific IFN-gamma producing T-cells against the Spike, the Nucleocapsid and the Membrane protein. Conclusion(s): Homologous and heterologous booster doses of VLA2001 demonstrated a favorable tolerability profile irrespective of priming and induced broadly reactive neutralizing antibodies against the ancestral virus and variants of concern, including the currently circulating BA.4/BA.5.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims Immunocompromised patients have a reduced ability to generate antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination, and are at a high risk of SARSPOSTERS CoV-2 infection, complications and mortality. Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab (Evusheld) is a combination of two monoclonal antibodies which bind to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, preventing the virus entering human cells. Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab has been approved as COVID-19 prophylaxis for immunocompromised individuals, and is being used in over 32 different countries. The phase III PROVENT clinical trial found that high-risk participants prophylactically administered Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab had a significantly reduced risk of COVID- 19 infection after three and six months compared to controls. However, the PROVENT trial was conducted prior to the SARS-CoV- 2 Omicron wave, and did not include participants who had been previously vaccinated or infected. This systematic review provides an updated summary of the real-world clinical evidence of the efficacy of Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab for immunocompromised patients. The review reports breakthrough COVID-19 infections as its primary outcome. COVID-19-related hospitalisations, ITU admissions and mortality were included as secondary outcomes. Methods Two independent reviewers conducted electronic searches of PubMed and Medxriv, on 03/08/22 and 01/10/22. Clinical studies which reported the primary outcome of breakthrough COVID-19 infections after Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab administration were included. Clinical effectiveness was determined using the case-control clinical effectiveness methodology. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between intervention and control groups were also calculated. The GRADE tool was used to assess the level of certainty for the primary outcome. Results 17 clinical studies were included in the review, with a total of 24,773 immunocompromised participants from across the world, of whom 10,775 received Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab. One randomised controlled trial, ten retrospective cohort studies (two of which were preprints) and six prospective cohort studies (one preprint) were included. The majority of studies reported clinical outcomes during the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron wave. Six studies compared a Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab intervention group to a control group. Reasons for participant immunocompromise included rheumatology patients treated with immunosuppressant drugs, transplant recipients and those with malignancies. Overall, the clinical effectiveness of prophylactic Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab against COVID- 19 breakthrough infection was 40.47% (CI 29.82-49.67;p<0.0001), COVID-19 hospitalisation- 69.23% (CI: 50.78-81.64;p<0.00001), ITU admission- 87.89% (CI: 47.12-98.66;p=0.0008), all-cause mortality- 81.29% (66.93-90.28;p<0.0001 and COVID-19-specifc mortality- 86.36% (CI:-6.21-99.70;p=0.0351). Conclusion There is a growing body of real-world evidence validating the original PROVENT phase III study regarding the clinical effectiveness of Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab as prophylaxis for immunocompromised groups, notably demonstrating effectiveness during the Omicron wave. This systematic review demonstrates the significant clinical effectiveness of prophylactic Tixagevimb/Cilgavimab at reducing COVID-19 infection, hospitalisation, ITU admission and mortality for immunosuppressed individuals. It is critically important that largerscale and better-controlled studies are performed to highlight the significant clinical benefit of prophylactic antibody treatment in immunocompromised groups.
ABSTRACT
Intro: GBP510 contains the self-assembling recombinant nanoparticle displaying SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein receptor binding domain and is adjuvanted with AS03. We report interim Phase 3 study (NCT05007951) results up to 4 weeks post-dose 2 (Data-cut: March-18-2022), where immunogenicity to the D614G ancestral strain and safety of 25mug GBP510/AS03 candidate was compared to ChAdOx1-S (Vaxzevria). Method(s): This Phase 3 randomized, active-controlled, observer-blind, parallel- group study in adults was conducted in 6 countries. Cohort1: 1,895 subjects (naive to COVID-19 vaccination and infection) randomized at 2:1 ratio (GBP510/AS03:ChAdOx1-S) to assess immunogenicity and safety;Cohort 2: 2,141 subjects at 5:1 ratio, regardless of their serostatus at screening for safety assessment. Subjects were vaccinated twice at a 4-week interval with 0.5 mL of the test vaccine (GBP510/AS03) or active control (ChAdOx1-S) in deltoid muscle. The primary objective was to demonstrate the superiority of geometric mean titer (GMT) and non-inferiority in seroconversion rate (SCR: >=4-fold rise from baseline) of neutralizing antibodies over ChAdOx1-S by live-virus neutralization assay (FRNT). Finding(s): At 2 weeks post-dose 2, GMT ratio of the two groups (Test vaccine/Active control) was 2.93 [95% CI: 2.63, 3.27], satisfying the hypothesis of superiority (95% CI lower limit> 1). The SCR difference (Test vaccine - Active control) was 10.76% [95% CI: 7.68, 14.32], satisfying the hypothesis of non- inferiority (95% CI lower limit> -5%). Good cell-mediated immune responses for Th1 cytokines were also observed with the test vaccine (FluoroSpot). The AE incidence rate for the test vaccine was higher than the active control for solicited local AEs (56.69% vs 49.20%), and comparable for solicited systemic AEs (51.21% vs 53.51%) and unsolicited AEs (13.34% vs 14.66%) after any vaccination. Conclusion(s): Higher immune responses were observed with GBP510/AS03 compared to ChAdOx1-S against D614G strain after 2 weeks post-dose 2. GBP510/AS03 showed a clinically acceptable safety profile;no safety concerns were identified during the study period.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims Patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRD) are commonly treated with immunosuppressors and are prone to infections. Recently introduced mRNA SARS-Cov2 vaccines have demonstrated extraordinary efficacy across all ages. Immunosuppressed patients were excluded from phase III trials with SARS-We aim to fully characterize B and T cell immune responses elicited by mRNA SARS-Cov2 vaccines in patients with rheumatic diseases under immunotherapies, and to identify which drugs reduce vaccine's immunogenicity. Methods Humoral, CD4 and CD8 immune responses were investigated in 147 SARS-Cov2-naive patients with selected rheumatic diseases under immunosuppression after a two-dose regimen of SARS-Cov2 mRNA vaccine. Responses were compared with age, gender, and diseasematched IMRD patients not receiving immunosuppressors and with healthy controls Results IMRD patients showed decreased seroconversion rates (63% vs 100%, p=0.04) and cellular immune responses (59% vs 100%, p=0.007). Patients on methotrexate achieved seroconversion in 62% of cases and cellular responses in 80% of cases. Abatacept deeply affected humoral and cellular responses. Rituximab (31% responders) and belimumab (50% responders) showed severely impaired humoral responses but cellular responses were often preserved. Antibody titers were reduced with mycophenolate and azathioprine but preserved with leflunomide. Conclusion IMRD patients exhibit impaired SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-immunogenicity, variably reduced with immunosuppressors. Among commonly used therapies, abatacept and B-cell depleting therapies show the most deleterious effects, while anticytokines preserved immunogenicity. The effects of cumulative methotrexate and glucocorticoid doses on immunogenicity should be considered. Humoral and cellular responses are weakly correlated, but CD4 and CD8 tightly correlate. Seroconversion alone might not reflect the vaccine's immunogenicity.
ABSTRACT
Intro: The US CDC recommends that COVID-19 vaccines may be coadministered with other age-appropriate vaccines. There is limited data assessing outcomes, including reactogenicity, on such co-administration. For the first time, we present interim safety data of RZV administered concomitantly or sequentially with an mRNA-1273 booster vaccine. Method(s): In this phase 3, randomized, open-label, multi-center study (NCT05047770), adults aged >=50 years were randomized 1:1 to receive the first RZV dose with mRNA-1273 booster (50 mug) at day 1 and the second RZV dose at week (W)8 (Co-Administration group [Co-Ad]), or mRNA-1273 at day 1, the first RZV dose at W2 and the second RZV dose at W10 (Sequential group [Seq]). Descriptive analyses of solicited/unsolicited adverse events (AEs) with onset within 7/30 days post-mRNA-1273 or first RZV dose, and of serious AEs/potential immune-mediated diseases/AEs of special interest (SAEs/pIMDs/AESIs) reported until database freeze are reviewed. Finding(s): The exposed set comprised 267 (Co-Ad) and 272 (Seq) participants. In each group, most solicited AEs were mild/moderate in intensity and each with <=2.5 days median duration, the most frequent were injection site pain, myalgia, and fatigue. Unsolicited (vaccines-related) AEs were reported by 25.0% (2.9%) of participants post-mRNA-1273 in Seq, 25.2% (0.8%) post-RZV in Seq, and 37.1% (3.7%) in Co-Ad. SAEs/pIMDs/AESIs were reported for 6/1/2 participants in Co-Ad and 5/1/3 in Seq. In Seq, one SAE/AESI (pulmonary embolism) and one pIMD/AESI (cutaneous vasculitis) occurred 2 and 9 days postmRNA-1273 (before RZV administration), respectively, and were considered mRNA-1273-related by investigators. In Co-Ad, one AESI (chronic hepatitis) occurred 35 days post-second RZV dose, considered vaccines-related by Sponsor. No fatalities occurred. Conclusion(s): No safety concerns were identified. The frequency/severity/type of AEs were comparable between groups and consistent with the known safety profile of each vaccine, whether RZV and mRNA-1273 booster were administered concomitantly or sequentially. Co-administration may enhance vaccine coverage rates. Funding(s): GSKCopyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background: The tolerability of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines among people living with HIV (PLWH) has been understudied in vaccine trials. CoVPN 3008 (Ubuntu) is the largest multicenter Phase 3 efficacy trial of mRNA vaccines in sub-Saharan Africa. Method(s): We enrolled adults age >=18 years living with HIV or another comorbidity associated with severe COVID-19. Previously vaccinated individuals were excluded. Baseline testing included HIV, CD4 count and HIV viral load (VL) (if HIV+), anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and nasal swab SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). All participants receive vaccinations at months 0 and 6, and SARS-CoV-2 seronegative individuals also receive vaccination at month 1. This analysis includes mRNA-1273 vaccinations at months 0 and 1. Reactogenicity (solicited adverse events [AEs]) was assessed among a representative subset of participants (Safety Subset, SS) for 7 days post-vaccination. Baseline characteristics associated with moderate/severe reactogenicity events were assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Result(s): 14002 participants were enrolled in the trial (1510 into the SS) at 46 sites from 2 Dec 2021 to 9 Sep 2022. At baseline in the SS, 71% (1065) were female, median age 38 years (IQR 32-46), and median BMI 25.0 (IQR 20.7-30.2). 73% (1108) were SARS-CoV-2 seropositive, and 8.7% (131) had a positive nasal NAAT swab. 16% (197) had a history of tuberculosis. 84% (1267) were PLWH, with median CD4 count of 614 cells/muL (IQR 414-861);7.8% had CD4 count < 200. 21% (238) had detectable HIV VL (>=50 copies/mL), with median VL 1660 (IQR 182-23932). 14% (172/1262) and 12% (64/542) of PLWH reported moderate/severe reactogenicity after the 1st and 2nd vaccination (Figure), with no hospitalizations. Female PLWH and CD4 count >500 had 35% (p=0.03) and 44% (p=0.04) increased odds of moderate/severe reactogenicity, respectively. Other baseline characteristics were not associated with the odds of reporting moderate/severe reactogenicity among PLWH after 1st vaccination. Similar trends were seen after the 2nd vaccination, but none reached statistical significance. In multivariate models, female sex remained associated with increased odds of moderate/severe reactogenicity after the 2nd vaccination. Conclusion(s): Similar to observations in HIV-negative populations, mRNA-1273 was well tolerated by PLWH with more reactogenicity in females. Impaired inflammatory responses among participants with CD4 counts < 500 cell/muL may explain less moderate/severe reactions.
ABSTRACT
Background: Remdesivir (RDV) is a broad-spectrum nucleotide analog antiviral approved for the treatment of COVID-19 in patients who are hospitalized or non-hospitalized and at risk of progressing to severe disease. Here we present SARS-CoV-2 resistance analyses from the Phase 3 PINETREE trial. Method(s): PINETREE was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of nonhospitalized participants (N=562) with COVID-19 and >=1 risk factor for disease progression, randomized to receive RDV or placebo once-daily for 3 days. The whole genome of SARS-CoV-2 was sequenced from nasopharyngeal swabs collected at days 1 (baseline), 2, 3, 7, and 14 using next-generation sequencing. Emergent amino acid substitutions in SARS-CoV-2 from participants treated with RDV were tested in a replicon system to determine if they alter sensitivity to RDV. Result(s): Resistance analysis criteria included all participants in the RDV group and 50% in the placebo group with viral load above the lower limit of detection for the viral load assay. Of 281 participants who met these criteria, baseline and postbaseline sequencing data were available for 115/130 (88.5%) participants in the RDV group and 129/151 (85.4%) participants in the placebo group (Table 1). Among these, emergent substitutions in Nsp12 were observed in 8/115 (7.0%) in the RDV group and 7/129 (5.4%) in the placebo group. A total of 7 emergent amino acid substitutions in Nsp12 were observed in the RDV group, but not in the placebo group. Among these, only one substitution from one participant (A376V;first detected at day 14), showed reduced in vitro susceptibility to RDV, with a half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) fold-change of 12.6 compared with a wildtype reference. The participant achieved clinical recovery by day 14. None of the other substitutions impacted RDV susceptibility (EC50 fold-change <=1.4). Emergent substitutions in Nsp8, Nsp10, Nsp13, or Nsp14 were detected in 10/115 (8.7%) of participants in the RDV group and 10/129 (7.8%) in the placebo group, with substitutions in the RDV group showing similar susceptibility to RDV as the wildtype reference (EC50 fold-change <=2.3). Conclusion(s): Overall, emergent substitutions in the SARS-CoV-2 replication complex including Nsp12 were observed with similar frequency in the RDV and placebo groups, with only one participant developing a substitution associated with reduced in vitro RDV susceptibility, indicating a high barrier to the development of RDV resistance in COVID-19 patients.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Poor outcomes in COVID-19 patients (pt) are associated with C5a-C5aR axis activation. A C5a-specific monoclonal antibody, vilobelimab (VILO), improves outcomes in critically ill COVID-19 pt in a Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo (PLC)- controlled study [1]. Method(s): COVID-19 pt within 48 h of intubation were randomly assigned to receive 6, 800 mg infusions of VILO or PLC at a 1:1 ratio on top of standard of care. Predefined subgroup analyses by region and country were performed. Result(s): Forty-six (46) hospitals on 4 continents randomized 369 pt: VILO (n = 178), PLC (n = 191). VILO significantly reduced 28- (HR 0.67;95% CI 0.48-0.96;p = 0.027) and 60-Day mortality (HR 0.67;95% CI 0.48-0.93, p = 0.0163) using a predefined, unstratified per protocol analysis. Mortality rates at 28- and 60-days and VILO treatment effects, however, differed substantially between regions: Western Europe HR for 60-day mortality 0.59 [0.37-0.95], South Africa plus Russian Federation HR 0.62 [0.28-1.38] and South America HR 0.80 [0.46-1.39] (Fig. 1). The weak signal in South America is predominately driven by Brazil (n = 74), which showed a significant age imbalance with a median 9-years younger PLC group (44.5-years-old vs 53.5-years-old) with low 60-day mortality of ~ 32.5% in the PLC group versus ~ 43.3% in Western Europe. Adjusting for age group categories (<= 30, 31-40, 41-50, 51-60, > 60;Cox regression) for 60-day mortality changed the HR in Brazil (0.96 [0.44-2.10] for continuous age-adjustment) to values near the estimate for the entire study population (HR 0.77 [0.35-1.69] for age in categories), suggesting a by chance imbalance and not a statistically evident weaker effect in Brazil. Conclusion(s): Regional efficacy differences between the rest of the world and South America were driven by age imbalances between treatment groups, which do not diminish the robust efficacy signal for VILO in severe COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: C5a-C5aR axis activation is associated with increased mortality in severe COVID-19. Vilobelimab (VILO), a C5a-specific monoclonal antibody, improved mortality in severe COVID-19 patients (pts) in a Phase 3 multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PLC)- controlled study [1]. A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis was undertaken to assess VILO and C5a as well as antidrug antibodies (ADA) levels in the study. Method(s): Forty-six (46) hospitals on four continents randomized 369 COVID-19 pts (VILO [n = 178], PLC [n = 191]) within 48 h of being mechanically ventilated to receive 6, 800 mg infusions of VILO or PLC at a 1:1 ratio on top of standard of care. Blood samples were taken at screening, Day 8 and at hospital discharge for VILO and C5a and at screening and hospital discharge for ADA. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were used to analyze levels. Result(s): Screening blood samples for VILO and C5a were available for VILO (n = 93) and PLC (n = 99) from sites in Western Europe. On Day 8 after 3 infusions, mean VILO trough concentrations were 21799.3- 302972.1 ng/mL (geometric mean 137881.3 ng/mL) (Fig. 1). At screening, C5a was highly elevated and comparable between groups: VILO median 118.3 ng/mL, mean 130.3 ng/mL, PLC median 104.6 ng/mL, mean 123.2 ng/mL. By Day 8, C5a levels were reduced by 84.6% in the VILO group (median 14.5 ng/mL [mean 16.8 ng/mL], p < 0.001) versus a 19.6% increase in the PLC group (median, 119.2 ng/mL, mean 129.8 ng/ mL). Beyond Day 8, though PD sampling was sparse, C5a levels remained elevated for PLC whereas C5a slowly rose but did not reach screening levels for VILO. Treatment-induced ADA were observed in 1 pt in the VILO group (Day 40 discharge) and 1 pt in the PLC group (Day 25 discharge), both appeared independent of treatment. Conclusion(s): The PK/PD analysis shows that VILO efficiently inhibits C5a in pts with severe COVID-19 resulting in a robust clinical effect on mortality reduction without inducing ADA.
ABSTRACT
Background: SARS-CoV-2 variants resistant to monoclonal antibodies, and drug-drug interactions and potential mutagenicity of direct acting antivirals, heightens the need for additional therapeutics to prevent progression to severe COVID-19. Exogenous interferon beta is a promising therapeutic option against SARS-CoV-2 given its broad-spectrum antiviral activity and data suggesting impaired endogenous IFN production in individuals with severe disease. Method(s): The safety and efficacy of orally inhaled nebulized interferon-beta1a (SNG001) was evaluated in a Phase II randomized controlled trial on the ACTIV-2/ A5401 platform (NCT04518410). Adult outpatients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within 10 days of symptom onset were randomized to SNG001 once daily for 14 days or blinded pooled placebo. Primary outcomes included treatment-emergent Grade >=3 adverse event (TEAE) through day 28;time to symptom improvement of 13 targeted COVID-19 symptoms collected by daily study diary through day 28;and SARS-CoV-2 RNA < lower limit of quantification (LLoQ) from nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs at days 3, 7, and 14. All-cause hospitalization or death through day 28 was a key secondary outcome. Result(s): Of 221 participants enrolled at 25 US sites between February and August 2021, 220 (110 SNG001, 110 placebo) initiated study intervention, with a median age of 40 years, 55% female, and 20% SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated. There was no significant difference between SNG001 and placebo in Grade >=3 TEAEs (4% vs 8%, Fisher's exact test p=0.25). Median time to symptom improvement was 13 days for SNG001 and 9 days for placebo (Gehan-Wilcoxon test p=0.17). There was no difference in the proportion of participants with SARS-CoV-2 RNA < LLoQ at day 3, 7 or 14 (SNG001 vs placebo, Day 3: 28% vs. 39%;Day 7: 65% vs. 66%;Day 10: 91% vs. 91%;joint Wald test p=0.41). There were fewer hospitalizations with SNG001 (n=1;1%) compared with placebo (n=7;6%), but this difference was not statistically significant (Fisher's exact test p=0.07;Figure). All hospitalizations were due to COVID-19 and occurred among unvaccinated participants without protocol-defined high-risk factors. Conclusion(s): Inhaled nebulized SNG001 was safe and well tolerated but did not reduce SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels in the nasopharynx nor decrease time to improvement of COVID-19 symptoms in outpatients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. The non-statistically significant decrease in hospitalizations among SNG001 participants warrants further investigation in a phase 3 clinical trial. Cumulative incidence of hospitalization or death comparing SNG001 vs. placebo.
ABSTRACT
Background: Ensitrelvir is a SARS-CoV-2 3CL protease inhibitor approved in Japan under emergency regulatory approval system as an oral treatment for COVID-19. Here we report the key analysis results of 125 mg group of phase3 part (SCORPIO-SR). Method(s): This study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled study. Regardless of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status and presence of risk factors for severe disease, patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 within 120 hours from onset were randomized to oral administration of ensitrelvir 125 mg (375 mg loading dose on Day1), ensitrelvir 250 mg (750 mg loading dose on Day1), and placebo once daily, for 5 days. The primary endpoint was time to resolution of 5 symptoms of COVID-19 (stuffy or runny nose, sore throat, cough, feeling hot or feverish, and low energy or tiredness), and the key secondary endpoints include change from baseline on Day4 in the amount of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA and time to first negative of viral titer. The primary population for the primary and key secondary endpoints was patients with <72 hours from onset to randomization. Result(s): Median time to resolution of 5 symptoms was significantly shorter in 125 mg group (n=336, 167.9 hours) than placebo group (n=321, 192.2 hours) (p=0.0407). Mean change of viral RNA levels from baseline (log10 copies/mL) on Day4 was significantly greater in 125 mg group (-2.48) than in placebo group (-1.01) (p< 0.0001). The time to first negative of viral titer was significantly shorter in 125 mg group (n=199, 36.2 hours) compared to placebo group (n=211, 65.3 hours) (p< 0.0001). Mean changes from baseline in viral titers [log10(TCID50)/mL] were significantly greater in 125mg group on Day2 (-0.807, n=196) and Day4 (-1.108, n=197) than in the placebo group (-0.395, n=208 and -0.850, n=207, respectively) (p< 0.0001). (Table Presented) In the patients randomized within 120 hours of onset, median time to resolution of 5 symptoms was 189.7 hours in 125 mg group (n=582) and 200.3 hours in placebo group (n=572) (p=0.4352). No deaths or serious adverse drug reactions were reported in either group, and the incidence of serious adverse events between the two groups was comparable. Conclusion(s): Ensitrelvir demonstrated a significant reduction in the time to resolution of 5 typical symptoms of COVID-19, robust antiviral effects and good tolerability.
ABSTRACT
Background: Despite renal impairment (RI) being a risk factor for severe COVID-19, there are no approved antiviral treatment options for patients with severely impaired kidney function (eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or kidney failure) in the US. At the time remdesivir (RDV) was initially approved for the treatment of COVID-19, the impact of renal impairment (RI) on pharmacokinetics (PK) of RDV, its metabolites, and the excipient, sulfobutylether beta-cyclodextrin sodium (SBECD), was not known. Method(s): Here, we report the PK data supporting dosing of RDV in COVID-19 patients with severely impaired kidney function. PK samples for RDV and metabolites (GS-704277, GS-441524) were collected in the Phase 3 REDPINE study in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with severely impaired kidney function. Participants in this double-blind study were randomized 2:1 to intravenous (IV) remdesivir (200 mg on Day 1, then 100 mg daily up to Day 5) or IV saline as placebo-to-match. SBECD PK was analyzed in a phase 1 study in non-COVID-19 participants with normal kidney function, mild and moderate RI who received 100 mg dose of remdesivir (containing 3000 mg SBECD). The population PK analysis included observations from healthy and COVID-19 patients with full range of renal function across all adult studies. Result(s): Geometric mean exposures (AUCtau) observed in REDPINE Study as compared to PINETREE Study increased up to 553% for the GS-441524 metabolite (dependent on renal elimination) and to a lesser degree GS-704277 (294%, minor renal elimination) and RDV (78.9%;an increase explained by factors other than renal function, namely, hospitalization and body weight) (Table 1). The increased PK exposures were not associated with new safety signals in this study (n=163 remdesivir, n=80 placebo). Population PK analysis identified baseline eGFR as a significant covariate for GS-704277 and GS-441524 clearance, but not for RDV itself. SBECD PK was characterized by short half-life (t1/2) (1.6 hours in normal renal function to 3.8 hours in moderate RI) and fast plasma clearance (7.9 L/h in normal renal function). Analysis of SBECD in severe RI (REDPINE) is ongoing, but accumulation is not expected based on its observed short plasma t1/2. Conclusion(s): Given the observed PK and the absence of any new safety signals associated with increased metabolite levels in patients with severely impaired kidney function, no dose adjustment is recommended for RDV in COVID-19 patients with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, regardless of the need for dialysis.
ABSTRACT
Background: Bimekizumab (BKZ) is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody used in the treatment of psoriasis which selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F in addition to IL-17A.1,2 Data pooled over two years have indicated that BKZ is generally well-tolerated.3 We report three-year BKZ pooled safety data in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Method(s): Safety data were evaluated for all patients who received one or more dose BKZ in four Phase 3 trials (BE SURE [NCT03412747], BE VIVID [NCT03370133], BE READY [NCT03410992], and their ongoing open-label extension BE BRIGHT open-label extension [NCT03598790;data cut-off : 10/23/2021]) and four Phase 2 trials (BE ABLE 1 [NCT02905006], BE ABLE 2 [NCT03010527], PS0016 [NCT03025542], PS0018 [NCT03230292]). Safety data were evaluated separately for patients receiving BKZ dosed 320mg every four weeks (Q4W) or every eight weeks (Q8W). Exposureadjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) for treatmentemergent adverse events (TEAEs) are the incidence of new cases per 100 patient-years (PY). Result(s): Total BKZ exposure was 4,245.3 PY (N=1,789) across Phase 2/3 trials, and 3,876.4 PY (N=1,495) in Phase 3 trials. TEAEs occurred at a rate of 186.1 across Phase 2/3 trials, serious TEAEs at 5.6, and TEAEs leading to discontinuation at 3.5. Eighteen deaths occurred (0.4/100 PY), all unrelated to study treatment except one (relationship unknown). TEAEs occurred less frequently in Q8W- than Q4W-treated patients in Phase 3 trials. Consistent with previous reports, most common TEAEs (EAIR) in Phase 2/3 trials were nasopharyngitis (15.3), oral candidiasis (10.2), and upper respiratory tract infection (7.1).3 EAIR of serious infections was 1.2. Most frequently reported were serious coronavirus infections (0.2). There were no cases of active tuberculosis. EAIR of oral candidiasis was 10.2, decreased vs two-year data (12.6),3 and was less common with BKZ Q8W vs Q4W. The vast majority of oral candidiasis events were mild or moderate (99.4%);none were serious. EAIRs of hepatic events (4.0) and elevated liver enzymes (3.4) were decreased vs. two-year data (4.3 and 3.6, respectively).3 EAIRs for inflammatory bowel disease (0.1), adjudicated major adverse cardiac events (0.6), and adjudicated suicidal ideation and behavior (0.1) were low. EAIRs for other safety topics of interest were also low and were similar to or lower than two-year EAIRs.3 Conclusion(s): BKZ was well-tolerated over three years. No safety signals were identified;EAIRs of TEAEs did not increase compared with data from two years.3.
ABSTRACT
Background: Given the paucity of data on safety and effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccinations in lower income settings with high HIV prevalence, we evaluated a heterologous mRNA-1273 (Moderna) boost after priming with 1 or 2 doses of Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen, Johnson & Johnson) vaccine among health care workers (HCWs) in South Africa. Method(s): SHERPA is an open-label, phase 3 mRNA-1273 booster study, nested in the Sisonke Phase 3b implementation trial, that vaccinated ~500000 HCWs with 1 or 2 doses of Ad26.COV2.S from Feb and Dec 2021. Sisonke participants were offered mRNA-1273 boosters between 23 May and 12 Nov 2022 (median 17 and 8 months after 1 and 2 Ad26.COV2.S, respectively), with data cut-off on 12 Dec 2022. Reactogenicity and adverse events (AEs) were self-reported via an online data entry link shared by SMS with participants 1, 7 and 28 days after boosting. Using national databases analyses are underway to compare effectiveness against COVID-19 infections and severe disease with Sisonke participants who did not receive the booster. Result(s): 12188 HCWs (79.5% female, 28.6% with self-reported previous COVID-19 diagnosis) received a mRNA-1273 booster, of whom 44.6% and 55.4% had received 1 and 2 prior Ad26.COV2.S vaccines in Sisonke, respectively. 3056 (25.2%) reported being HIV positive, more among those receiving only 1 previous Ad26.COV2.S (26.8% vs 23.9%), and 1.4% reported not being on antiretroviral therapy. 17.0% of participants reported hypertension and 6.4% diabetes mellitus. 262 participants (2.1% of women, 2.5% of men) reported 234 reactogenicity events and 95 AEs post-vaccination, with more reported by those with prior COVID-19 infection (3.5% vs 1.6%), HIV negative status (2.5% vs 1.2%) and those who received 2 prior doses of Ad26.COV2.S (2.4% vs 1.8%) (Table). Among 159 (1.3%) reporting injection site reactions the commonest were pain (59.7%), swelling (42.1%) and induration (20.1%). Of 177 (1.5%) systemic reactogenicity events (all grade 1 or 2 severity), the commonest were myalgia (69.5%), headache (67.8%) and fever (37.9%). 14 participants had AEs of special interest or serious AEs, of which 4 (all AESIs of ageusia or anosmia) were deemed related to the booster. 13 COVID-19 infections occurred a median of 125 days post booster vaccination (IQR 90-154) after 3477 person-years of follow up. Conclusion(s): A mRNA-1273 booster administered after 1 or 2 doses of Ad26. COV2.S was well tolerated regardless of HIV status, other chronic conditions or prior COVID-19 infection.